Search for: "DAVIS v. STATE"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 5,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2012, 11:08 pm
Bd. of Educ., 777 F.2d 1403, 1410 (10th Cir. 1985); Davis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 2:14 pm
United States, dealt with the authority of police officers to detain those who leave a residence that officers have come to search.In an earlier case, Michigan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
Davies, Laura F. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 6:55 am
While FPC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
Here, the State agreed that Tweedy should not have been convicted of both offenses and further agreed that the manufacture of methamphetamine conviction should be reversed. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:35 pm
Here, the State agreed that Tweedy should not have been convicted of both offenses and further agreed that the manufacture of methamphetamine conviction should be reversed. [read post]
7 May 2008, 7:38 am
Dishong v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:23 am
Bush, with introductory note by Julian Davis MortensonUnited States Supreme Court: Munaf v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Many facets of Wednesday’s oral argument in the Fisher v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:17 pm
Something odd happened during Monday’s 59-minute oral argument in Ayestas v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:52 am
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 2:38 pm
The court drew an analogy to Davis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
The district court for the Middle District of Florida answers that question in Mena v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:43 pm
Under the latest good-faith exception case, Davis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
Tracy v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 3:05 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 4:24 am
He also doubted the reasoning of the trial judge regarding negative declaratory relief being an appropriate remedy, stating that it is “at best, an ungainly remedy”. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 1:47 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 9:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
