Search for: "Decisive Media, Inc." Results 1941 - 1960 of 4,857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2017, 4:28 am by Jon Hyman
Well, employers, pop those champagne corks, because earlier this week, in Macy’s, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 9:00 pm by News Desk
” Bloomberg news reported a slightly different version of the retailer’s decision on Friday. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 7:24 pm by Nikki Siesel
It is in use in the U.S. in universities, cultural organizations, and in broadcast media. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
As the Supreme Court of Canada held in R v. 974649 Ontario Inc. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 9:10 pm by Dan Flynn
I am not sure how the vast conglomerate that is Disney makes its decisions. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 7:54 pm by Dennis Crouch
 The patent claims a system for “disseminating media … episodes in a serialized sequence. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The entire decision in this case, including Board, dissent and Administrative Law Judge’s opinion is 29 pages. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The entire decision in this case, including Board, dissent and Administrative Law Judge’s opinion is 29 pages. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
Similar DDoS attacks were carried out by Rakhshan on Fairfax Media5, a media company in Australia and New Zealand; The Metro News, a daily newspaper; Canadian Broadcasting Corporation; and Canada.com, a social media discussion site. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:08 am by Jani Ihalainen
A case that has dealt with the 'generification' or 'genericisation' of trademarks has been going on in the US for over 5 years (discussion on the first instance decision here), culminating in a Court of Appeal decision in mid-March.The case of Elliott v Google Inc. deals with the registration of over 760 domain names by David Elliot, which incorporated both the word "Google" and other well-known brands, such as Disney, in the domain name. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:07 am by Scott Bomboy
The only rule is that Twitter Inc. gets to decide who speaks and listens -- which is its right under the First Amendment. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Lisa P. Ramsey
As this trademark law is now unconstitutional after Tam, it appears that Pro-Football, Inc. will prevail in its dispute with the government over the cancelled registrations. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:36 am by Robert Chesney
As 2016 wore on, questions of this kind began to appear in public, and by September the media was reporting that DNI Clapper and SecDef Carter both were in favor of splitting up the dual-hat. [read post]