Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 6,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2021, 5:15 am
By applying the CICS to victims of trafficking, the United Kingdom has chosen to confer a degree of protection to promote their interests. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 7:05 am
United States, 429 U.S. 338, 350–51, 97 S.Ct. 619, 50 L.Ed.2d 530 (1977), the record is devoid of any evidence that King Mountain is Mr. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 1:25 pm
In People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:47 pm
My coauthor, Andrew Green, and I argue that the singular focus on the policy preferences of Supreme Court justices is apt to miss an important dimension of Court dynamics--the degree to which the justices engage in cooperative decision-making.Here's the abstract:Over the past 25 years, the justices of the Supreme Court of Canada have not exhibited the divergent policy views along party lines that have been characteristic of the justices of the United States… [read post]
29 Mar 2009, 7:52 am
Hampton v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
In that case, Sutton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
United States First Circuit, 03/22/2011 US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:34 pm
United States First Circuit, 03/22/2011 US v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:53 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
Eaton v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
" And, in our times, Citizens United and its progeny, along with Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 1:17 pm
In Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
The United States Supreme Court has expressly ruled that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination only extends to testimonial or communicative evidence. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
CITY OF JACKSONVILLE FLORIDA United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:01 am
This question is situated within a larger inquiry about the extent to which various provisions of the Constitution apply extraterritorially as exemplified by such cases as United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
Linde v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 4:41 am
, 718 P.2d 88 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit 1983).Once this low threshold is met, the evidence is admissible unless provided otherwise in `the United States Constitution, a federal statute, [the Federal Rules of Evidence], or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 3:41 pm
An individual may have an odor of alcohol but not be intoxicated or impaired within the legal definition as held in People v Miller and Mulvean v Fox. [read post]
