Search for: "Doe 74" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,387
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2013, 7:59 am by emagraken
It is not the type of note which one would expect would be wrongfully recorded. [74]         While I acknowledge the comments of N. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:06 am by Jon Gelman
Dec 31, 2010 On Wednesday, April 8, 2009 [74 FR 15985], the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), announced in the Federal Register plans to evaluate ... [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Sander Greenland and others have raised various theoretical objections to the argument that relative risks should exceed two before attribution can be made in specific cases. [read post]
29 May 2013, 6:07 pm
Of course, age alone does not determine one’s ability to survive a traffic accident in Miami or any community. [read post]
29 May 2013, 2:03 pm by Martin Schwartz
However, there does not appear to be any funding included for the Division’s extended duties. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The claim does not define any method falling under the exception of A 53(c), it defines a product which, according to established case law (T 1695/07, T 1798/08), does not fall under the exception clause.For the sake of completeness the Board notes that it may also be possible to assemble the different parts of the claimed graft in an artificial aorta, should it become necessary to test whether a product falls under the scope of the claim or not.Should you wish to download the… [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:58 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
But it does make me wonder – and let’s face it, you were thinking it, too: is Ramsey going to have to pay tax on that free McDonald’s? [read post]
23 May 2013, 3:08 pm
  does it matter if it is produced at home as a one off rather than commercially? [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
[As you can see, the essay does not mention Margolin's affair with Fly, a married father of two, which commenced at TVA and continued after he became chairman of the Federal Communications Commission in September 1939. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:21 pm by WIMS
Moreover, EPA's program guidance does not clearly define each type of OCA deferral or specify in detail the documentation EPA regions should have to support their decisions on OCA deferrals. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am by Schachtman
A second type of error, commonly called Type II Error, occurs when one declares a causal relationship does not exist when in fact it does. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
” Id. at 145 (citing Stephan Fuchs & Steven Ward, “What Is Deconstruction and Where and When Does It Take Place? [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:24 pm
The Government made this declaration in the face of the existing Copyright Act of 1956 (Cap, 74) which states as follows: " In accordance with the preceding subsection, but subject to the following provisions of this Act, the copyright in a work is infringed by any person who, not being the owner of the copyright, and without the licence of the owner thereof, does or authorises another person to do, any of the said acts in relation to the work in the United Kingdom or in any… [read post]
3 May 2013, 4:24 pm
The Government made this declaration in the face of the existing Copyright Act of 1956 (Cap, 74) which states as follows: " In accordance with the preceding subsection, but subject to the following provisions of this Act, the copyright in a work is infringed by any person who, not being the owner of the copyright, and without the licence of the owner thereof, does or authorises another person to do, any of the said acts in relation to the work in the United Kingdom or in any… [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:57 am by Larry Catá Backer
More specific, SAFE released the 2012 SAFE regulations in December 2012, before the 2013 SAFE Notice came out, does the 2011 SAFE Notice which is based on the 2009 SAFE Regulation apply? [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:43 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Here are the key numbers: 74% support the decision to try Tsarnaev in federal court, as opposed to the 19% who opposed it. [read post]