Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 39,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2009, 5:40 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 8:13 pm
Because the cancellation of a patent in an inter partes review does not grant the patentee any compensable claim against the United States, we affirm the Court of Federal Claims’s dismissal of the case for failure to state a claim. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 5:01 am
Doe write a Statement of Allegiance to the United States. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland and the United Kingdom both submitted third-party comments in TV Vest v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 10:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
Vermont removed the action from Vermont state court to the United States District Court, District of Vermont. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 11:12 am
”) State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 4:41 pm
See Touhy v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm
See Touhy v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 4:41 pm
See Touhy v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
In this patent infringement action between Emblaze and Apple, Apple filed a motion to stay the case pending the recent grant of certiorari in Akamai v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:42 pm
In reaching its holding, the Court held that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 1:12 pm
No, says the Indiana Court of Appeals in Garcia-Torres v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 2:15 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Return Mail, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 10:43 am
Accordingly, the district court remanded the case of LLOG Exploration Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 8:40 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2024, 1:54 pm
Not only is the State required to produce evidence under Article 39.14, but it remains compelled to produce Brady material under a long line of precedent from the United States Supreme Court and federal and state appeals courts interpreting Brady. [read post]
