Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2022, 2:00 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 02/03/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers… [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Democrats have a lock on New England and I foresee greater gains in the West. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The review procedure is governed by the Demoted Tenancies (Review of Decisions) (England) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/1769. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The review procedure is governed by the Demoted Tenancies (Review of Decisions) (England) Regulations 2004, SI 2004/1769. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
So, in Severance v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The draft Public Order Act 1986 (Serious Disruption to Life in the Community Regulations 2023, if they come into effect, will allow police in England and Wales to impose restrictions on protests and processions that cause “more than minor” hindrance to day-to-day activities for other people. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 6:25 am
Today's Hindu carries an op-ed by Vishnu V. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
COVID-19 Pandemic Issues The Honorable Susan V. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Despite this, a major study conducted as the outbreak was peaking was published in the New England Journal of Medicine [1]. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
The claimant responded by issuing proceedings in England, and applied for an anti-suit injunction in respect of the Spanish proceedings brought by the defendant. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 3:06 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
Unsurprisingly the Supreme Court this morning affirmed the decision of the trial judge and the Court of Appeal that the helmet was not an artistic work, but has reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal that the action based on infringement of copyright in the United States could not be brought before a court in England and Wales. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 9:09 pm
They could accept the 13th amendment, but nothing past that.With 1896's Plessy v. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 8:28 am
The Supreme Court of Canada, in Adler v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:29 am
This morning in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Airways Inc [2010] EWHC 3094 (Pat) Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Patents Court for England and Wales, did something that not many judges do -- he gave summary judgment in favour of a defendant in a patent infringement action. [read post]
12 May 2008, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court's ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The judge stated clearly that the Al Rawi principles applied in the current case. [read post]
