Search for: "Human v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 19,119
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2013, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
As the Supreme Court said in United States v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:54 pm by Anna Kloeden
The European Court of Human Rights yesterday began a public hearing in the case of Tymoshenko v. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court said that to the extent it is relevant here, RCSD and not Employee bore the burden of establishing its entitlement to a collateral offset* by clear and convincing evidence” that Employee was obligated to mitigate damages by obtaining a collateral offset and RCSD failed to meet its burden in that regard.The Appellate Division then modified the Commissioner’s determination by (1) increasing the award for past lost wages from $107,558.51 to $195,758.51, (2) increasing the award… [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:02 pm by Ben Cheng
House of Representatives in oppositionReply of petitioner Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am by Kristiina Reed, Six Pump Court
On 2nd November 2015 the Supreme Court heard the case of Regina (Wang Yam) v the Central Criminal Court and Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 9:22 am
It draws on his work over the arc of his mandate and its object is to summarize the basic human rights obligations of States on environmental matters, as they have been clarified by human rights bodies. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm by Matt Murphy
 This is the standard of proof Georgia created when instructed not to execute the mentally retarded in Aktins v. [read post]
19 Oct 2024, 2:44 pm by centerforartlaw
This highlights the tension between the desire of Italy and other states to safeguard their cultural heritage and the limitations imposed by the territoriality principle, preventing the extension of national laws beyond state borders. [read post]