Search for: "In re April B." Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 9:48 am
In re Fitness Holdings International, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 1800000 (9th Cir. 2013). [read post]
9 May 2013, 3:20 am
The latest issue of the Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme (No. 94, April 2013) is out. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
A reduced appeal fee pursuant to R 6(3) was paid on 7 March 2012, and a full appeal fee was paid on 27 April 2012 […]. [read post]
7 May 2013, 2:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
P. 26(b)(1) (emphasis added); see, e.g., Fed. [read post]
Your car keeps flying forward, paying no mind to the fact that you’re trying to slow down. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
I also wish to request a B-2 visa for my wife and 2 children, who will accompany me in this trip to the United States." [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:43 pm by Cathy
He was there because Prenda Law is now running for the exits, seeking to dismiss AF Holdings’ case against defendant Joe Navasca “without prejudice” — meaning, with the option to re-file. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:56 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  All other rights reserved Filed under: Employee Benefits, Employers, ERISA, Excise Tax, Health Plans, Human Resources, Insurance, Tax, Uncategorized Tagged: Affordable Care Act, annual limits, Employee Benefits, ERISA, Health Insurance, Health Plans, Isurance, RE, SBC, Summary of Benefits and C [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 9:50 am
”“So we need to be here, we are very glad to be here, and we feel very lucky that we found someone to head our new office who shares our values, who is a passionate lawyer, an inspirational leader and une fière Québécoise,” Viner said.Rodrigue, who oversaw the opening of the Montreal office in Place Ville Marie on April 2, following her nomination as Montreal managing partner in February, said she is building a team with lawyers not… [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:26 am by John L. Welch
The Examining Attorney should have asked for more information, under Rule 2.61(b), according to Judge Bucher. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm by Ken White
He was there because Prenda Law is now running for the exits, seeking to dismiss AF Holdings' case against defendant Joe Navasca "without prejudice" — meaning, with the option to re-file. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:47 pm by Cathy Gellis
He was there because Prenda Law is now running for the exits, seeking to dismiss AF Holdings' case against defendant Joe Navasca "without prejudice" — meaning, with the option to re-file. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:00 am
DriverTech LLC (In re Bill of Lading Transmission & Processing System Patent Litigation), 681 F.3d 1323 (Fed. [read post]