Search for: "Lawrence v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,042
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2008, 9:55 pm
  According to Justice O'Connor, in her concurring opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor, heard 9-10 & 12 February 2015. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Rick Pildes
  The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:43 am
Hardwick, which had held that same-sex intimacy is not a fundamental right, but Lawrence does not clearly state that it is a fundamental right; and District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am by Edith Roberts
Next up is Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:00 pm
  Meanwhile, former State Department Intelligence Analyst Lawrence C. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 7:00 am by Karen Tani
Indeed, she provides an array of legal actions involving Quakers, perhaps most famously, Tinker v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am by Peter Mahler
Lawrence Factory Stores v Ogdensburg Bridge & Port Auth. (202 AD2d 844, 845 [3d Dept 1994]) because the agreement identified the specific purpose of [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Davis II Chair in Law, Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Peter M. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:14 pm
Summary of Legal Developments: Federal Judge Blocks the LCFS Reductions in the average carbon intensity level were set to begin in 2011, but the corn ethanol industry, the refining industry, truckers and other interests have challenged the constitutionality of LCFS in a consolidated action before District Judge Lawrence O’Neill in the Eastern District of California (Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 7:52 am by Amy Howe
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]