Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:30 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:24 am
In their submissions to the Expert Group, the Scottish Government and the Lord Advocate had called for appeals to the Supreme Court in criminal cases to be ended altogether, so Salmond was no doubt hoping that this is what the Review Group (headed by Lord McCluskey) would recommend. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was already a possession order and, on the state of the law at that time (pre Knowsley HT v White in the House of Lords), there could be no legitimate expectation of getting an assured tenancy as the AST would have been ended. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was already a possession order and, on the state of the law at that time (pre Knowsley HT v White in the House of Lords), there could be no legitimate expectation of getting an assured tenancy as the AST would have been ended. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
She then gave the example of the WHO’s FluNet as an instance of international collaboration between private enterprise, government and charities which bears potential to be encouraged.Following the presentations, Lord Justice Arnold sparked a discussion on compulsory licensing and tailored remedies, noting that eBay v MercExchange e [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 5:34 am
The Christian Institute & Ors v The Lord Advocate (Scotland), heard 8-9 March 2016. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am
In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Samantar v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:48 pm
On the other hand the House of Lords in Scandecor Developments AB v Scandecor Marketing AB seemed rather inclined to validate bare licensing. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458 at paragraph 16: …Causation need not be determined by scientific precision; as Lord Salmon stated in Alphacell Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
He stated that “In a case like the present, the parties have made their own law by contracting, and can in principle un-make or re-make it”. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
In McTear v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:01 pm
" (Lord Acton). [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
The Court of Appeal noted that it was extremely unlikely that the draughtsman of the 1995 Act had used the term enjoyment in a more extensive manner than that set out by the House of Lords in Southwark London Borough Council v Tanner & Others [2001] 1 AC. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
But Lord Justice Atkins’ conclusion on this limb of the case highlights the near-impossibility, at least in the present state of authority, of doing anything about it if a final look shows the result to be unjust. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Modaresi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ … Court of Appeall: Statutory appeals *must* be on time, as no discretion to extend time under CPR. [read post]
