Search for: "New York v. New Jersey" Results 1941 - 1960 of 3,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
The Court held that the foreign manufacturer did not specifically avail itself of the New Jersey market and therefore could not be sued in a New Jersey court.Nicastro is revealing for a number of reasons. [read post]
12 Jul 2006, 5:12 am
"The Board found that CDS's use in Utah, New Jersey, New York, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania was "de minimis and nebulous," amounting mostly to discussions rather than rendering of services. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:18 pm by Mark Murakami
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, the court held that a lease provision that charged rent on "container throughput" was not an unconstitutional duty of tonnage. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm by Todd H. Lebowitz
The New Jersey attorney general recently filed a major misclassification lawsuit. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:40 pm
  And for those of us in the Philadelphia, New Jersey, New York area, we got it today. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 6:12 am by Michelle Claverol
Flood damage is typically excluded from most commercial property policies, but businesses sustained many other types of losses that should be covered under most commercial policies despite the flood damage and lack of flood insurance.Mandatory evacuation orders were issued by the governors of New York, New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 12:10 pm
" Here, the government attempted to satisfy this element by showing that the instrument had been brought from New Jersey to New York for the 2006 meeting. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Seelig (1935) invalidated a New York law prohibiting the sale in the state of milk bought outside of New York. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
 (Patent Docs) (SmartBrief) (GenericsWeb) OxyContin (Oxycodone) – US: Ranbaxy admits infringement in OxyContin suit – District Court S D New York approves consent judgment between Ranbaxy and Purdue Pharma (Patent Docs) Reyataz (Atazanavir) – US: Complaint filed in Delaware: Infringement of US patent following a Paragraph IV challenge: Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 10:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“The critical question, then, is whether the matter affects the public interest in New York, not whether the suit is brought by a consumer or a competitor. [read post]