Search for: "People v Cooper" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,878
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 9:15 pm by Sri Medicherla
Cooper argued that the bill would undermine legal protections for wetlands, resulting in “more severe flooding for homes, roads and businesses, and dirtier water” for people in the state. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Shannon O'Hare
It is a duty of all the parties to seek to cooperate, to ensure that a remote hearing is possible. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
Merpel adds, if there is to be further cooperation and dialogue, can I put in a plea that the Court cooperates further by answering the questions posed by the national court rather than, as sometimes appears to happen, substituting its own? [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:32 am by SHG
  Your cooperation is appreciated. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 7:16 pm
The letter read in part: "Because you were a witness in the case of the People v. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 4:38 am by SHG
The People argue that under People v Mingo (12 NY3d 563, 571-573 [2009]), we should accept this one-sentence assertion at face value as “reliable hearsay,” but doing so extends Mingo beyond the analytic boundaries of its holding, absolves the People of their burden of persuasion, and renders the SORA proceeding a farce. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 3:47 am by SHG
This is the sort of cooperation one would expect, hope for, under sub-optimal circumstances. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am by charonqc
Lord Justice Laws said: “We do not live in a society where all the people share uniform religious beliefs. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:23 am by The CGCP Team
A good arbitration case serving as guidance is B&R Typical Case 6 (Zhe Jiang Yisheng Petrochemical Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 6:51 pm by Darren O'Donovan
(Professor Clive Symmons has written about the importance of considering this estoppel point when analysing the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Boland v An Taoiseach case). [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 5:42 pm
The FTC asked OpenAI to provide detailed descriptions of all complaints it had received of products making “false, misleading, disparaging or harmful” statements about people. [read post]