Search for: "Press v. State" Results 1941 - 1960 of 17,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2007, 10:32 am
But when it comes to a free, independent, and vibrant press (I'm tempted to say uninhibited and robust also, to quote NYT v. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:52 am by INFORRM
Public order cases involving protests have always sparked controversy, with the collision between the state’s responsibility to ensure the smooth running of civil society and the individual citizen’s right to draw attention to what they regard as a pressing moral concern. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
It targets the press, which the court is particularly sensitive to, but the State did not offer much evidence that foreign interference occurred through typical “news outlets”. [read post]
21 Aug 2016, 10:32 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Later, it was revealed administrators feared “bad press,” as their parent company was already under scrutiny for two other deaths in Wilmington. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:47 am
  The reports have been known about for some time, and are mentioned prominently in the complaint in McIntosh v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am by INFORRM
In ETK v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWCA Civ 439), Ward LJ acknowledged the desirability of the press being able to embarrass the famous: “To restrict publication simply to save the blushes of the famous, fame invariably being ephemeral, could have the wholly undesirable chilling effect on the necessary ability of publishers to sell their newspapers. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
John Oberdiek (Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Rutgers Law School) has posted The Trouble with Trespass (Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, Volume 5 (Oxford University Press, 2024), edited by Leslie Green and Brian Leiter) on SSRN. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 10:16 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In a 32-page opinion written by New Jersey Supreme Court Chief Justice Stuart Rabner, the Garden State's High Court ruled that records from the Rutgers (University) Environmental Legal Clinic ("RELC") were not subject to being produced under the Open Public Records Act ("OPRA") [N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1].In Sussex Commons Associates, LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:34 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
District Court Judge Reed O’Connor in the Northern District of Texas declared the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) unconstitutional in an opinion in Brackeen et. al. v. [read post]