Search for: "STATE v. HARRIES"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 5,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 9:49 am
The National Conference of State Legislatures estimates that if the debt ceiling is not raised by August 2, the United States will have only $12 billion to pay its $32 billion of obligations. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:15 am
Another episode delves into Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:26 am
Harris, 141 N.J. 207, 213 (1995).] [read post]
11 Aug 2018, 6:45 am
Brownback, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Saturday, August 11, 2018 Editor's Note: V. [read post]
24 May 2013, 9:32 am
The Third DCA ultimately reversed the trial court in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
’ Harris v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:05 pm
Scott v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 3:23 am
A couple years ago, the 8th District decided in State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:45 am
In reaching its decision, the Court cited United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 6:28 am
The court said that 1) prosecutors must show that drug dogs are reliable before they can be used to obtain evidence from a car (Harris v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 6:35 am
Harris Associates (08-586) – standard of legality of investment advisors' fees Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 4:52 pm
United States Lawrence Lessig, a Harvard Law School professor, sued The New York Times for defamation for falsely sugges [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
STATE OF TEXAS; from Bexar County; 7th district (07-07-00274-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-28-07)08-0058 TAMMY ELKINS v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:08 pm
See Harris v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:25 am
California Attorney General Kamila Harris appealed this decision and seeks to overturn it. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:35 am
Harris. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:10 am
In light of the five-year anniversary of the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 5:57 pm
In People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
United States; Harris v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:07 am
But here’s another doozy: The People (of California) v. [read post]
