Search for: "STATE v. HARRIES"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 5,751
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2017, 1:43 pm
Waymo v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:24 am
My amicus brief in the pending California Supreme Court Hassell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:20 am
“This Court cannot countenance a claim by the Governor and Legislature of a State that there is no duty on state officials to obey federal court orders resting on this Court's considered interpretation of the United States Constitution in Brown v. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:14 pm
” Mozes v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
On Appeal from the 152nd District Court Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Case No. 2016-41521. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 6:49 am
On Appeal from the 189th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Case No. 2015-24829. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
The US Supreme Court has spoken directly on this point in Young v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
”Raven should be considered alongside the 2009 ruling (almost two decades later) in Strauss v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
In 2013, the California Attorney General (now-Senator Kamala Harris) joined a letter to Congress complaining that Section 230 prevented state AGs from prosecuting Backpage. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 1:43 pm
As we recently discussed, in McKeen-Chaplin v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
That balance is remarkably reflected in the August 16, 2017 decision in Weisberger v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 9:43 am
Ann Richards touted tripling the size of the prison system as a means of rural economic development which she hoped would help stave off a GOP takeover of the state. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
While Rose J in Secretary of State for Defence v Nicholas [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch) (our note) had set aside a writ at least partly on the basis that notice of the application under CPR 83.13(8)(a) had not been given, Nicholson could be distinguished from the present case as in this case, in addition to the knowledge the Appellant gained from his active participation in all proceedings up to the conclusion of the hearing before HHJ Harris, there was at the very least… [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 4:19 am
While Rose J in Secretary of State for Defence v Nicholas [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch) (our note) had set aside a writ at least partly on the basis that notice of the application under CPR 83.13(8)(a) had not been given, Nicholson could be distinguished from the present case as in this case, in addition to the knowledge the Appellant gained from his active participation in all proceedings up to the conclusion of the hearing before HHJ Harris, there was at the very least… [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 5:38 am
I sometimes show short movie clips at the start of lecture classes too- I have shown short clips of relevant sections of "Eyes on the Prize" in my Con Law class on Brown v Board and affirmative action/Bakke- not sure it can be streamed but usually your law library will have or can ILL the DVDs- and some "Firing Line" clips of William F Buckley debating the ERA (these are on YouTube), etc.Elizabeth Pleck: Loving v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
As the unanimous Court said in the 1974 Watergate Case, United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 4:16 pm
Prince Harry v Mail Online On 4 March 2017, the Mail Online published an article headlined, “Time to cool off! [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 12:59 pm
” (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 ¶77 150). [read post]
