Search for: "Soling v. New York State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 3,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 3:40 am
The New York Experience In New York as in most other states, the statute providing oppressed minority shareholders with standing to seek judicial dissolution does not define oppressive conduct, which has been left to the courts to define. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 3:34 am
The decision cited in support the New York Court of Appeals’ 1958 opinion in Steinbeck v Gerosa for the proposition, which I’ve seen expressed in countless cases involving disputed partner status, that “[a]n indispensable essential of a contract of partnership or joint venture, both under common law and statutory law, is a mutual promise or undertaking of the parties to share in the profits of the business and submit to the burden of making good the… [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 4:16 am
Federal courts are supposed to follow New York State law, not change it. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Broyles v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
JUDGE GRIESA 11 CV 2472 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jonathan Tasini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:34 am
The court, reversing the federal district court in the Southern District of New York, ultimately ruled that it does not. [read post]
18 May 2021, 11:13 am
Department of Social Services of the City of New York. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:59 am
More Blog Posts: New York DWI Charge Dismissed Because Defendant’s “Body is a Brewery,” Illinois DUI Lawyer Blawg, January 11, 2016. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 4:54 am
Ackerman v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
”Noting that New York State’s Attorney General has similarly interpreted the exemption in Article 23-A [see 1981 Ops Atty Gen No. 81-7], the court said that while an opinion of the Attorney General is not binding, it "is an element to be considered. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
This post is an outline of a few thoughts (written quickly, so please read accordingly) on making national security arguments, following the government's oral argument made last evening in State of Washington & State of Minnesota v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:46 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:08 am
Sunshine in Zito v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:05 am
And why would the New York Times give it real estate? [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Thus, in Lawson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
* Does an invention have a sole? [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm
To contact the New York State Safety Anonymous Reporting Hot Line please call: 1-877-7SAVENY (877-772-8369). [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am
The plaintiff and defendant were the sole witnesses at trial. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 10:54 pm
V, 1292b] These insights apply, I believe, with equal force to the constitution of a law for corporate codes. [read post]
