Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1941 - 1960 of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
This morning, I attended the Supreme Court arguments in the cell phone search cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by Aren Sharifi
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third party derivative suit pursuant to Fed. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:     In 1934, in the midst of the Depression, the United States Supreme Court, in Home Building & Loan Ass’n v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:16 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
In a 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed this issue in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:04 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
In a 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit addressed this issue in Rescuecom Corp. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 8:56 pm by Sex Crimes
The constitutional issues were previously decided by the Eleventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:19 am by Kent Scheidegger
Litigants have had fair notice since at least United States v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am by Holly Brezee
The pending appeal before the Supreme court of the United States is styled Susan K. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 1:36 pm
Hashtag as a trademarkThe United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in § 1202.18 of The Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) provides  that a mark consisting of variants of the term HASHTAG or the hash symbol mayfunction as a mark only when such mark “functions as an identifier of the source of the applicant’s goods or services”. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]