Search for: "Branch v. Mays"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 5,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
The first is Gill v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm
Circuit in Tucker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 11:03 am
In Matter of Dunn, Lake v M.P.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 3:09 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 2:49 pm
Case of Escher v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Norton Simon Museum of Art at Pasadena v. von Saher 14-545Issue: Whether the Ninth Circuit, in holding that this action should proceed, properly second-guessed and rejected the executive branch's U.S. foreign policy determinations. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 8:07 am
Many may disagree with me on this. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
As the Eight Circuit said: That Missouri may lawfully withhold its assistance from federal law enforcement . . . does not mean that the State may do so by purporting to invalidate federal law. . . . [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 8:30 am
The growth of the Executive Branch, which now wields vast power and touches almost every aspect of daily life, heightens the concern that it may slip from the Executive’s control, and thus from that of the people. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 8:04 am
Joyner reports the 2nd Court of Appeals made a similar ruling in September in Connecticut v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 1:09 am
” When asked to explain Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:46 am
The style of the case is, Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:08 am
The principals of each branch orally agreed in 1951 that the proportion of shareholding of their respective branches would not change, and provided, for this purpose, that any member of a branch who wished to sell his shares must first offer the shares to his own branch. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 12:18 pm
BNC Bancorp v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:55 pm
The Supreme Court today gave a stinging defeat to President Barack Obama in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
18 Dec 2021, 9:54 am
This limitation is constitutionally mandated, separating our branch from our political co-branches. '[F]ederal judges—who have no constituency—have a duty to respect legitimate policy choices made by those who do.' [quoting Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Planning Board so that an Environmental Impact Statement may be prepared (see Matter of West Branch Conservation Assn. v Planning Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 207 AD2d 837, 841; Matter of Holmes v Brookhaven Town Planning Bd., 137 AD2d 601, 604). [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 6:23 am
Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Planning Board so that an Environmental Impact Statement may be prepared (see Matter of West Branch Conservation Assn. v Planning Bd. of Town of Clarkstown, 207 AD2d 837, 841; Matter of Holmes v Brookhaven Town Planning Bd., 137 AD2d 601, 604). [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 8:42 am
Constructions can and do change over time without Article V amendment. [read post]
