Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 6,955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
The New York State legislature has not passed any law instructing either the executive branch or the courts how to deal with the question of marriage recognition. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:40 pm
The case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:29 am
Instead, decisions like Dames & Moore v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
In delivering the lead judgment Lord Mance stated that CMR, art 34, qualifies the position that a successive carrier becomes party to the contract of carriage under the terms of the consignment note. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 6:52 am
United States. [read post]
31 May 2013, 11:53 am
Cuevas v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm
What restraints does this patent impose in this branch of mechanic art? [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:57 pm
EFF also submitted an amicus brief in the Supreme Court case Octane Fitness v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:22 pm
EPA, King v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm
EW v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:28 pm
SPRAWLDEF et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:50 pm
And court consideration of patent validity issues coexisted with actions by the legislative and executive branches to revoke patents, actions which of course did not require a jury. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 10:10 am
Keays, stated as follows:In order to be entitled to aggravated damages, Ms. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:55 pm
She was appointed by the Court to make those arguments in the case of United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm
Doing so really would put the Supreme Court in a state of outright war with the Democratic Party. [read post]
15 May 2017, 10:08 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:33 am
”), and (2) that under the state constitution, there is no good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 10:23 pm
As to the State as an employer, on March 24, 2009 Governor Paterson directed that approximately 9,000 positions in the Executive Branch of government be abolished in an effort to help close the State's 2009-2010 budget gap. [read post]
