Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 8,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
Ruiz v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 4:05 pm
It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
From Ganske v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
That taxonomy may have influenced the Supreme Court’s analysis of patents in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
VIDAL, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:05 am
Or it would require that the Constitution explicitly states that no rights of this kind exist.For many years everyone assumed that there was absolutely no way that Roe v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:28 am
Recording Corp. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am
We also agree with the Supreme Court’s determination denying that branch of the defendant’s motion which was based upon CPLR 3211(a)(3) to dismiss the fourth cause of action insofar as asserted against the defendant for lack of standing (see General Obligations Law § 13-101; Greevy v Becker, Isserlis, Sullivan & Kurtz, 240 AD2d 539, 541). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" Finding that "in light of all of the circumstances of this case, the penalty of termination is not irrational and does not shock the conscience," the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should not have granted that branch of the Plaintiff's petition seeking to vacate the penalty of termination of the Plaintiff's employment as a tenured teacher.* Citing Matter of Watkins v Board of Educ. of Port Jefferson Union Free School Dist., 26 AD3d 336,… [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
" Finding that "in light of all of the circumstances of this case, the penalty of termination is not irrational and does not shock the conscience," the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should not have granted that branch of the Plaintiff's petition seeking to vacate the penalty of termination of the Plaintiff's employment as a tenured teacher.* Citing Matter of Watkins v Board of Educ. of Port Jefferson Union Free School Dist., 26 AD3d 336,… [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
("The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that police officers are public officials," Soke v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
” The majority emphasizes that, in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although advisory opinions have been prohibited in American federal courts since the late eighteenth century, several state supreme courts do accept requests for advisory opinions from state legislatures and/or the governor. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
On July 20, the Ninth Circuit declined to rehear en banc Fazaga v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:51 pm
He states, over and over again, that the individual mandate was "terminated. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 4:12 pm
The vulnerability was with the companies cloud services branch. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 6:14 am
June Medical Services v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am
In the seminal case of Dames & Moore v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
