Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 4,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 1:20 am
Abgrenzungen und Wirkungen im Verhältnis zum nationalen und völkerrechtlichen Kollisionsrecht, Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht 139, Mohr Siebeck 2023 (XXVI, 693 p.) [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
United States dissent, later embraced by the Court in Katz v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:30 am
It also reads a little like a monopoly-based competition complaint in the sense that Facebook is, by far, the dominant social network on the Web with more than 800 million users. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 8:04 am
Pix credit Peter Breughel Younger, Peasant Fight 1620During times of stability, these engagements tend to serve the system well enough--and might be understood as an important element of the political contests that run deep, long, and endlessly within and as the U.S. political system, and which ensure that healthy tensions between factions (and their ideological campaigns and the zealotry that attends to them) produce tremendous costs to efforts to dominate the political field and… [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 10:03 am
If the Court were to do as asked, legislators with control of their chambers would have no limit on how far they could go to create for their party an enduring domination of seats in state legislatures and even in the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:13 am
Also, see Appeal Court of Düsseldorf stating that the different treatment of SEP licensees is accepted if it can be justified as a result of normal market behaviour, and that licensing conditions can be abusive, only if they are significantly different between licensees; see Sisvel v Haier, Appeal Court of Düsseldorf, 30 March 2017 - Case No. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
• Since there was no New Zealand authority on non-literal copyright infringement it was germane to consider English and United States authorities on non-literal software copyright infringement. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
Parsing the Oral Arguments: FEF and Beckstead & Watts v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 7:35 am
Smith v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
(The feature was important enough to be mentioned in Article V’s amendment procedures. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
In Carrasquillo v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:03 pm
In an end-of-the-term flurry that was not lacking in forceful dissents, Chief Justice Roberts’ dissent in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:58 am
Notably, the 2023 Thaler v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 3:38 am
While a 2002 decision, People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 9:20 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1:1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 4:01 am
Industries brought an action before the Court of First Instance, which held that the Board of Appeal had wrongly stated that the marks at issue were clearly distinct. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 7:43 pm
That's certainly a set-back for consumer advocates and state regulators, who had high hopes that the juggernaut of OCC world domination would be somehow forced to grind to a halt. [read post]
