Search for: "Does v. United States of America" Results 1961 - 1980 of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2018, 8:08 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
As we previously reported, the fate of the DACA program now rests in Judge Hanen’s hands, who is currently presiding over a lawsuit filed by the State of Texas along with seven other states (State of Texas, et al., v. the United States of America, et al.). [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by Ronald Mann
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:17 am by NCC Staff
United States, the dispute is over the following question: “Does a driver have a reasonable expectation of privacy in a rental car when he has the renter’s permission to drive the car but is not listed as an authorized driver on the rental agreement? [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am by Guest Blogger
You in the United Nations are your brothers’ and sisters’ keepers in America, and you have the power to help us get justice for my brother George Floyd. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHWARTZ, Defendants.09-CV-2271(JS)(GRB)     UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK     2012 U.S. [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:04 pm by Sandra Park
The resulting federal court victory in Thompson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280 (third relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]