Search for: "Frank v. Frank" Results 1961 - 1980 of 6,554
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In the words of the Appellate Division, “as the arbitrator grounded his reasoning in the evidence, including an assessment of the employee as frank and apologetic,” the Department’s contention that termination is the only appropriate penalty “is without merit,” citing United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v Board of Education, 1 NY3d 72. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 11:30 am
To be honest, I'll have to talk more with Frank about this, whose knowledge in this area is both infinite and infinitely greater than mine. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm by INFORRM
The deal was characterised as “underhand, dubious and lacking in frankness” [13]. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 2:26 am by UKSC Blog
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 Vedanta Resources Plc & Anor v Lungowe & Ors, heard 15-16 Jan 2019 Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Ors v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, heard 27 June 2019 Unwired Planet International Ltd… [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:05 am by J
It’s the costs fall-out from Price v Leeds CC [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 A.C. 465 (the other case with Kay v LB Lambeth). [read post]