Search for: "Labelle v. State" Results 1961 - 1980 of 8,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2021, 12:39 am by Neil Wilkof
Having lost at first instance, Birkenstock stated on appeal (before the Court of Appeal of the Hague) that the result in the Birkenstock v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 6:18 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the issuance of Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 18 emergency exemptions to the states of Georgia, Minnesota, and Utah permitting the use of BiaXamTM B110-V and BiaXamTM B110-P (BiaXam), adhesive film used as supplemental residual surface coating, in Delta Air Lines planes and facilities in those three states. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:54 am by Bonnie Park
  The case Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Pliva, Inc. v Mensing (564 U.S. 604 [2011]), the Supreme Court found that these plaintiffs’ state-law claims against generic manufacturers were preempted by federal law under the Supremacy Clause to the extent that state-law failure-to-warn statutes required generic drugs to provide more stringent, safer warning labels. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 6:42 pm
The Washington Post reports today that questions from Supreme Court justices during oral argument in Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 12:48 pm by William A. Ruskin
However, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled in PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:39 am by Jarod Bona
Supreme Court last week issued an interesting opinion on its scope in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]