Search for: "Law v. Cross"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 15,224
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2013, 8:11 pm
(European Commission v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
In Rubin, whether enforcement may be effected through the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
Hester v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 8:19 am
Case Citation: Dangaard v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 7:46 am
Yet, just this last winter in American Red Cross v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
The International Court of Justice opinion in Nicaragua v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:42 pm
Cameco Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm
India The Economic Times has highlighted concerns in the development of India’s privacy laws, particularly cross border privacy rules. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:39 am
Some of the book’s topics cross over to this topic, but cybersecurity law is so technical and specialized that I think it needs its own standalone course at this point. * Internet patents, NPEs/PAEs, etc. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 pm
In support of the claims, they filed an agreement dated 1986 through which a designer assigned to Mr De Gregorio the copyright in the crossed fingers sign which appears on the left. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The NSW Court of Appeal has heard the appeal and cross appeal in the case of Chris Gayle v Fairfax Media. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Headly, J.), entered August 28, 2023, which granted respondent's cross-motion to dismiss as untimely the petition challenging the agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition reinstated. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Headly, J.), entered August 28, 2023, which granted respondent's cross-motion to dismiss as untimely the petition challenging the agency's partial denial of a request for records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL), and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the petition reinstated. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
The Federal Court of Appeal recently dismissed the appeal and cross-appeal (Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:19 am
Ground Three: Dismissed as section 7A amended the existing law such that the system created by the 2020 Regulations was lawful without the requirement of cross-community support. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm
" Paul v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 7:47 am
–Shah v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm
Golinksi v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 6:32 am
In a decision published this spring, Davis v. [read post]
