Search for: "Line v. Line"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 45,541
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 3:54 pm
In Grade v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
"The Court held in R.A.V. v St. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Supreme Court overruled 50 years of precedent to eliminate the “physical presence” bright-line rule for substantial nexus in its South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:10 am
This fall, in Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Diehl v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:52 am
Diehl v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
The Second District Court of Appeal has modified its opinion in Lu v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 9:06 pm
Piszczek v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 3:59 pm
Depends on a ton of things.Not a bright-line rule, so it'll have some transaction costs and uncertainty. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 1:23 pm
Rules create the so-called “bright lines” between entitlement and disentitlement; rules are also, by their nature, insensitive to particular household circumstances.In two recent decisions of the the Upper Tribunal, Administrative Appeal Chamber, the rules have been challenged as being insufficiently sensitive to individual household needs: RG v SSWP and North Wiltshire DC (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) and IB v Birmingham CC [2011] UKUT 23 (AAC). [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:23 am
The problem of subgroup analyses is exacerbated by defense counsel’s emphasis on statistical significance as a “bright-line” test. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 10:50 am
Check the Johnson v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 10:24 am
NY's high court, in a 5-2 decision (People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:53 am
Alkire Truck Lines, Inc., 299 S.W.2d 518, 521 (Mo. 1957)]; see also Henson By and Through Lincoln v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:25 pm
Severance v. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 7:35 am
The case is entitled Smith et al. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 8:03 am
Nidec Motor v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 9:59 pm
The bottom line of this guidance was that the "practice and procedure before the Board will not change," except in the rare situation in which the "entirety of the evidence of record before the Board in in equipoise as to the unpatentability of one or more substitute claims. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:03 am
Supreme Court will rule in the Bilski v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:59 pm
L’Anza Research Int’l, Inc., 523 U.S. 135 (1998) which held along the same lines. [read post]
