Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2011, 12:04 am by Kevin LaCroix
We believe this action could be a model for future investor claims outside the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
We find that the district court properly exercised its discretion to impose a sentence without a presentence report under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 6A1.1(a)(2). [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm by David Kopel
Cooley, General Principles of Constitutional Law 271 (2d ed. 1891) (discussing the implicit right to train with weapons)); United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am by Zack Bluestone
In a symbolic show of force, the United States dispatched “a small armada” to patrol the disputed waters of the South China Sea, according to the Navy Times. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm by Guest Author
Building on his previous work overturning the myth of the “weak state”—illustrated in this period by twin historical narratives of a “race to the bottom” in corporate regulation and Thomas McCraw’s depiction of the Louis Brandeis as economically incompetent—Novak insists that this era should be characterized instead by its “creation of brand-new sites and creative new rationales for the continued regulation of corporate… [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
  The first respondent, Carlos Gutierrez, came to the United States when he was five and became a lawful permanent resident (which, as the name suggests, allows him to stay in the United States as long as he doesn’t get into trouble with the law) when he was nineteen. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
Supreme Court held that a use tax could not be imposed on a foreign corporation that had no physical contact with the taxing state. [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:15 am by Don Cruse
STATE OF TEXAS, No. 14-0226 Disposed on orders list of May 8, 2015 CITY OF DALLAS v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
John operating in the United States, at least three United States groups and a Cuban association share the nonexclusive license to use Plaintiff’s name. [read post]