Search for: "Mark I. Congress" Results 1961 - 1980 of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2011, 10:36 am
As a defective prescription drug lawyer, I am very pleased with this court decision. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 10:15 am by Steven Berk
This new legislation marks the beginning of what I can only hope will be a new attitude toward whistleblowers—one of appreciation. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:59 pm
  I'm sure that in Washington the view was: good on them. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 1:14 pm by David Levine
If the sponsors have changed their tune, and rather suddenly, then that appears to be a concession that our criticism has been on the mark. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:27 am
The Wall Street Journal notes a massive sea change in Presidential Politics is in the offering: Mark down the date. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:43 am
  As I say, I doubt I'm clever enough to come up with a very good answer. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:15 pm by Kevin
It begins with the Prime Minister speaking, and at the :03 mark, a noise can plainly be heard emanating from someone or something in the chamber and lasting for approximately two to three seconds. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 7:40 pm
” Four Short Reflections on Jiang Shigong’s Essay on “Philosophy and History”Flora Sapio This blog post has been written as a part of the debate provoked by the publication of an essay by Jiang Shigong 强世功 in the “Open Times” in January 2018, with the title “Philosophy and History: Interpreting the “Xi Jinping Era” through Xi’s Report to the Nineteenth National Congress of the… [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 8:00 am by Bill Marler
A few days ago I posted “Seriously, FSIS and Congress, it is time to deem Salmonella an Adulterant. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Noah Chauvin
Before Section 702 was extended until April 19 by the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024 (NDAA), HJC and HPSCI each marked up a bill to reauthorize the law. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 9:59 pm
This is truly what Mark Tushnet has described as "constitutional hardball," and yet the legislature apparently is unaware that the game, like Congress itself, is being played. [read post]