Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 11:40 am
B [2010] EWHC 1626 (Comm), paras [25-31] (court rejected challenge based upon tribunal’s failure to apply Spanish law); Ruby Roz Agricol LLP v The Republic of Kazakhstan [2017] EWHC 439 (court declined to apply expansive interpretation of Kazakh law).5See English Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69; Enterprise Insurance Company Plc v U-Drive Solutions (Gibraltar) Limited [2016] EWHC 1301 (QB) (court lacked jurisdiction over appeal because Section 69 conditions were not… [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:46 am
Here's an example:Let's assume that you need to write an essay that has the following title:“In my judgment the test of quality has been re-stated but … not significantly altered by Infopaq” (per Proudman J, NLA and Others v Meltwater and Others, [2010] EWHC 3099 (Ch), para 81): do you agree with Proudman J that the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Infopaq, C-5/08 and its progeny has left the traditional… [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 10:13 am
(Petition ¶;¶ 76-78.) [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:13 am
The stated purposes are what dictate how the information can be used, but do not dictate the means of dissemination. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:13 am
The stated purposes are what dictate how the information can be used, but do not dictate the means of dissemination. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:00 pm
United States, 102 F. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:51 am
In Operton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:08 am
¶15 (citing RCJJ, LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:00 am
In its decision, the court stated that the “enforcement of a warranty does not depend on the purchaser’s belief as to the truthfulness of the warranted facts” (at para 16). [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
[para 38]. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 2:13 pm
See para 3.5 which states "The application of the proportionality principle by courts provides yet another safeguard. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm
Va., 2017) See King’s Discharging Taxes in Consumer Bankruptcy Cases, at ¶ 3.11(f)(4), ¶ 3.13. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:58 am
Cuyahoga No. 102768, 2016-Ohio-696, ¶ 51-52; and Boals v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Statute clearly and deliberately distinguished someone detained under Sch 3, para 2 (who could be released on bail) from someone liable to detention under Sch 2, para 21 (who could be temporarily admitted). [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
Dyson MR held that bail may not be granted under paras 22 and 29 of Schedule 2 of the 1971 Act where someone is unlawfully detained purportedly under Sch 3, para 2(2) or where someone not currently in detention could not lawfully be detained under that provision. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 7:23 am
Cia Siderurgica Do Para Cosipar; Daewoo Int’l Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
As the British Columbia Court of Appeal stated in Niedermeyer v Charlton, 2014 BCCA 165 (CanLII) at para. 79: “the discussion of public policy in Tercon tends to focus on the conduct of the party who seeks to rely on the exclusion clause” [emphasis in original]. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 6:18 am
They summarize the basic human rights obligations of States on environmental matters. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
B ¶;¶ 49, 53. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:07 pm
It is as useful to watch the positions of influential Cubans in the United States. [read post]
