Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 18,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2008, 2:36 am
In SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 8:12 pm
Now, with the help of the ACLU, the ICP is suing the FBI again to challenge the designation. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am
Constitution’s amendment rule, Article V, created high hurdles to constitutional change in an effort to entrench the exclusion of enslaved Africans from “we the people. [read post]
28 May 2013, 5:05 am
Some people say it’s degrading. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
” (People v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:00 am
NAACP and McAleenan v. [read post]
[Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] Los Angeles v. Patel and the constitutional structure of judicial review
9 Jul 2015, 5:17 am
Sibron v. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
In a more recent case, Lujan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 12:49 pm
Today in People v Louree, 2007 NY Slip Op 04679, the Court of Appeals held that where a trial judge does not fulfill the obligation to advise a defendant of postrelease supervision during a plea allocution, the defendant may challenge the plea as not knowing, voluntary and intelligent on direct appeal, notwithstanding the absence of a postallocution motion. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:39 pm
The Court quickly disposed of defendant’s Blakely argument, noting that People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:01 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 9:18 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 11:59 am
Google and Langdon v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
The judgment in the case of Narbutas v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
First, in 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
It says all people must be treated equally by the government, but the government actually has leeway in regulating people and industries differently, so long as those distinctions are not irrational as a matter of law.The case is Progressive Credit Union v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:13 am
People following these challenges will no doubt be waiting for the Court’s decision with bated breath, but there shouldn’t be much suspense. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:32 pm
Contrary to respondents' contention, the issue here is not likely to recur (see generally id. at 811-812; People v Rikers Is. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:40 am
In the first, Matal v. [read post]
