Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2020, 1:45 am
Lord Burrows gave the sole judgment. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
Unsurprisingly, in my view, in the light of Lord Justice Nichols famous dictum in Lloyds Bank Plc v Rosset [1989] 1 Ch 350 (a case with many similar features): "There was, I repeat, physical presence on the property by the wife and her agent of the nature, and to the extent, that one would expect of an occupier having regard to the then state of the property: namely, the presence involved in actually carrying out the renovation necessary to make the house fit for… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 1:14 pm
In McTear v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
In the same case, the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) made clear that there was nothing in the UK legislation to prevent workers from taking holiday during a period of sickness absence. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 1:41 am
In doing so, he referred to the leading authority Proctor v Bailey(1889) 42 Ch 390, which states that “… an injunction is granted for prevention, and where there is no ground for apprehending the repetition of a wrongful act there is no ground for an injunction“. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
Supreme Court's decision yesterday in Samantar v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
Home Office v Essop & Ors; Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 14-15 November 2016. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:01 pm
" (Lord Acton). [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:56 am
He stated that “In a case like the present, the parties have made their own law by contracting, and can in principle un-make or re-make it”. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458 at paragraph 16: …Causation need not be determined by scientific precision; as Lord Salmon stated in Alphacell Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor, heard 27-28 Mar 2017. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:28 am
Modaresi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ … Court of Appeall: Statutory appeals *must* be on time, as no discretion to extend time under CPR. [read post]
Reaffirmation of New Directions in Recylcled Bottles--Address of Leo XIV to the College of Cardinals
12 May 2025, 10:33 am
Your presence reminds me that the Lord, who has entrusted me with this mission, will not leave me alone in bearing its responsibility. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 1:56 pm
This concept was described by Lord Briggs JSC in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Co Ltd [2018] UKSC 21 as promoting access to justice, as it allows solicitors to provide litigation services on credit to clients with strong cases who do not have the financial means to pay upfront. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm
The Court of Appeal noted that it was extremely unlikely that the draughtsman of the 1995 Act had used the term enjoyment in a more extensive manner than that set out by the House of Lords in Southwark London Borough Council v Tanner & Others [2001] 1 AC. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Rep. 489, 498 (1763) (Lord Chief Justice Pratt). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
But Lord Justice Atkins’ conclusion on this limb of the case highlights the near-impossibility, at least in the present state of authority, of doing anything about it if a final look shows the result to be unjust. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 1:53 am
She then gave the example of the WHO’s FluNet as an instance of international collaboration between private enterprise, government and charities which bears potential to be encouraged.Following the presentations, Lord Justice Arnold sparked a discussion on compulsory licensing and tailored remedies, noting that eBay v MercExchange e [read post]
