Search for: "State v. Scott" Results 1961 - 1980 of 5,706
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
” Following is an excerpt: A New York federal court recently declined to certify under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 23”) six classes of salaried “apprentices” at Chipotle restaurants asserting claims for overtime pay under New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) and parallel state laws in Missouri, Colorado, Washington, Illinois, and North Carolina, on the theory that they were misclassified as exempt executives in Scott et… [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 3:43 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
It’s mostly Potter Stewart’s definition of obscenity from his concurrence in Jacobellis v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 7:15 am
Jerry reveals: “The sexual harassment laws, of the United States at least, are purposely designed to protect employees and do not extend to independent contractors. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am by Dennis Crouch
Joseph Scott Miller, United States Supreme Court Ip Cases, 1810-2019: Measuring & Mapping the Citation Networks, 69 Cath. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett and Lee Kovarsky discuss Davila v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At Constitution Daily, Scott Bomboy considers how last week’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am by Edith Roberts
Andrew Maury and Scott Benjamin Cohen preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
Scott Martin-MadridMan Websites, WIPO Case No. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [John Kenneth Ross, IJ “Short Circuit” on Davis v. [read post]