Search for: "State v. Stewart" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,089
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2020, 1:59 pm by Mark Walsh
” Alito says, in reference to a statute that President Barack Obama’s administration declined to defend in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am by Roger Parloff
The government seeks 25 years imprisonment for the group’s founder and leader that day, Elmer Stewart Rhodes III, and sentences ranging from 10 to 21 years for the other eight. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am by Frank Cranmer
” It appears that the Crown Prosecution Service commented that the Bible contains references “which are simply no longer appropriate in modern society and which would be deemed offensive if stated in public”. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Concern NRC OIG Finds Defects In Nuclear Reactor Components USDA & DOI Release Wildland Fire Management Documents NAS Report On Challenges Facing The Corps of Engineers EPA Advisors To Review Report To Congress On Black Carbon Stewart and Jasper Orchards v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:04 am
The seminal case addressing Congress's power to enforce the Constitution is City of Boerne v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Stewart Professor of Business Law at the University of Oregon School of Law. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:14 pm by Georgialee Lang
Not so in the United States where Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Martha Stewart and others faced charges, not for steroid use or securities fraud, but for lying. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:26 am by jonathanturley
In comparison, Daniels may be the only authentic part of the entire case in New York v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
" The petitioners rely heavily on a 1990 California Supreme Court decision, Raven v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Paula Black
” United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart must have felt equal frustration when trying to define “obscenity. [read post]