Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 40,642
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Examples include: Evidence of the original meaning of the Contracts Clause and ways it might be reinvigorated through litigation Potential theories under the Citizenship Clause State constitutional anti‐monopoly and anti‐gift provisions and other causes of action unique to state law or state constitutions The Ninth Amendment Questions left open by North Carolina Dental Board and ways in which parties can use the Sherman Act to hold… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
Examinations Under Oath – Insurer Requests Have to Be Reasonable and Made Before the Claim Is Denied
24 Aug 2023, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
That is the challenge of producing static rules constructed in ancient and traditionally developed analogue forms—words, text, objectives bound up around systems of administrative discretion ultimately exercised by technical and political officials in complex interlocking or [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm
” Judge Legg reported last week on Dinnena v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
From yesterday's decision in Human Rights Defense Center v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:52 am
Schutte v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:44 am
” In other words, if AI writes a draft for one client, while you meet with another client, can you bill for both? [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She was the United States Solicitor General when the challenges to the statute were being resolved by the lower courts. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
He stated [emphasis added]: “[27]. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
From McCollum v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 1:53 pm
This is Part V in EFF’s ongoing series about the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 11:12 am
Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) and Goldstein v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:24 am
Given the Ninth Circuit decision in Martin v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:32 am
From Friday's decision in Amor v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
We propose to draw on existing precedent in wider UK legislation as a starting point for these options” In other words, failure to comply with these obligations would be subject to stronger enforcement besides the option to only bring civil proceedings against the company that is currently available to the Secretary of State. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Technologists v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
M.B. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 4:54 am
The post Case Review – 1936230 Ontario Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Montague v. [read post]
