Search for: "Stewart v. State" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,311
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2009, 9:22 am by Ashby Jones
His opinion seemed carefully chosen to conform with Justice Potter Stewart’s 1967 definition of when a state court’s decision could rise to the level of creating a judicial taking. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
In other words if the government thinks your client is a reprehensible terrorist you are not supposed to give him/her the zealous representation that the Code of Professional Conduct and state law demands. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 1:36 pm
Thursday we began a series on the Second Circuit of Court of Appeals decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:14 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
" [of the result]I first scoured the majority opinion, written by Ginsburg, looking for how the court would distinguish the principle in this case from the principle in [United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm by Anna Christensen
Justice Potter Stewart first broached this possibility in 1967 in his concurring opinion in Hughes v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 1:46 pm by Sandy
That' s not going to happen now.The Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:36 am
In light of this recent federal enactment, multiple state laws to the same effect, and even public opinion polls suggesting support for the death penalty in such cases, was the Court's decision in Kennedy v. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 3:11 pm
Stewart, Deputy Solicitor General, did not have much more of an easy time. [read post]