Search for: "U. S. v. Court"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 10,795
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2021, 10:26 am
Today the Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in Thomas More Law Center v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:41 am
Supreme Court ruled in Tandon v. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:07 am
" Judge Michael Baylson rejected defendant's argument:Following the reasoning in Hansler, the Court finds that dismissal of Plaintiff's FMLA interference and retaliation claims at this stage would be improper. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:40 pm
" Montgomery, 577 U. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm
Graham, 560 U. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 9:23 am
S., at ___ (slip op., at 22) (quoting Workman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 7:11 am
See Everson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 3:03 am
Scarola Malone & Zubatov LLP v Ellner 2021 NY Slip Op 31199(U) April 8, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651324/2017 Judge: Anthony Cannataro pits a “sophisticated businessman, with degrees from Wharton and the University of Chicago” against the attorneys in a legal malpractice counterclaim. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 6:28 pm
Louis U. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:15 pm
In a unanimous decision, the U. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am
ShareThe humanitarian stakes were indiscernible in Monday morning’s oral argument in Sanchez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
U. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
Supreme Court granted the AFC’s motion, and directed a new hearing. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
" Noting that "A court may set aside an administrative penalty only if it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness", the Appellate Division opined that "[u]nder the circumstances here, the penalty of termination of the [Plaintiff's] employment was not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness," citing Matter of Pell v… [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 7:30 am
" Noting that "A court may set aside an administrative penalty only if it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness", the Appellate Division opined that "[u]nder the circumstances here, the penalty of termination of the [Plaintiff's] employment was not so disproportionate to the offense committed as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness," citing Matter of Pell v… [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 9:14 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 3:31 pm
Today, in Lopez-Soto v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 1:37 pm
The Issue in Front of the Supreme Court In the case, Caniglia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:08 am
Supreme Court Ruling in Torres v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 11:50 am
In FCC v. [read post]
