Search for: "United States v. California" Results 1961 - 1980 of 13,833
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:46 pm by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, ___ U.S. ___, 139 S.Ct. 2162, 204 L.Ed.2d 558 (2019) On June 21, 2019, by a 5-4 vote, the United States Supreme Court in Knick v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm by Jim Shore
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court issued a long-anticipated decision in City of Ontario v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:34 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
Spokeo, Inc., the United States District Court for the Central District of California granted in part and denied in part defendant Spokeo, Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 6:00 am by Beth Graham
  In addition, the trial court stated the California Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Iskanian v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:40 am by Timothy P. Flynn
A proactive clerk in Dona Ana County, New Mexico began issuing same-sex marriage licenses last August in the wake of the SCOTUS' same-sex marriage decision in United States v Windsor. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:06 pm by The Complex Litigator
United States District Court Judge Susan Illston (Northern District of California) certified in part a class action alleging the failure to reimburse work-related mileage expenses. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:58 pm
The U.S. and Facebook Service While there have been no cases in the United States yet permitting service of process via Facebook, it is not unreasonable to assume that the United States will also continue with the trend started abroad. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:29 pm by Josh Blackman
") Finally, lurking in the background is yet another United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:08 am by brettb
The state appeals court affirmed, relying on Geier v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 4:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Today we have an odd little opinion from the Ninth Circuit confirming that this doesn't violate the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]