Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 1961 - 1980 of 4,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
United States, holding that increasing sentences under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act violates the Constitution, and Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:53 am by Tara Hofbauer
Paul discussed the Supreme Court’s decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Paul Rothstein, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, addressed the use of hearsay in a criminal trial in his review of Ohio v Clark,* a decision recently handed down by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
According to that court, an undocumented immigrant’s continued presence in the United States does not itself involve “moral turpitude. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm by Quinta Jurecic
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul alerted us to the Supreme Court’s pending decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
United States, rests on a narrow, grudging reading of Congress’s war powers. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic
United States, a major ruling on military commissions. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
To pursue this objective, the Article relies on two strange bedfellows: the law of corporations and the philosopher Paul Grice. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am by Victoria Kwan
Two days later, Justice Scalia appeared in Durham for the United States Tax Court’s Judicial Conference, which was hosted at Duke Law School. [read post]