Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,230
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Second Circuit said that “rather than looking to the identity of the parties, the type of security at issue, or whether each individual defendant engaged in conduct within the United States, we hold that a securities transaction is domestic when the parties incur irrevocable liability to carry out the transaction within the United States or when title is passed with the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:12 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
United States is available on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 10:21 am by NCC Staff
The Next Major Challenge to the Affordable Care Act By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley discusses Kelley v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 9:24 am by Jason Shinn
This means they are illegal under federal law and under many state laws, including Michigan. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 1:33 pm
In June 2019, Vitamin Energy was sued in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by International IP Holdings, LLC, and Innovation Ventures, LLC, the owners of trademarks for 5-hour Energy liquid energy shots. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am by Amy Howe
United States (Nov. 2): Whether the failure to file an annual report disclosing foreign bank accounts counts as a single violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, no matter how many foreign accounts a taxpayer has, or whether a violation occurs each time an individual account is not properly reported. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
   United States v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 1:14 pm by NCC Staff
Kalt, Professor of law & The Harold Norris Faculty Scholar, Michigan State University College of Law Brian C. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 11:16 am by William Eskridge
This ongoing, thoughtful process contributed not only to the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision striking down Section 3 of DOMA in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 5:20 pm
§ 1341, in a scheme to defraud the United States Department of Transportation's Federal Highway Administration of money and property by certifying non-qualifying entities for participation in Kentucky's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise ("DBE") program. [read post]