Search for: "WILSON v. THE STATE" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,371
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2008, 3:05 pm
Any change in Riles' case or state law could have a direct effect on many Texas inmates.The Supreme Court ruling referenced is the 1986 case, Ford v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The Bladensburg Peace CrossThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that a cross-shaped monument may be preserved on public land because it does not violate the Constitution's Establishment Clause.Cultural property watchers may not have noticed the case of American Legion et al. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Some state statutes limited the coverage for workers’ compensation to diseases that manifested within a certain time window during and after employment. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:17 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 11:08 am by John Floyd
State – police officer’s testimony regarding time of death; Austin v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:37 pm
Wilson    Eastern District of Michigan at Flint 08a0437n.06 Johnson Controls v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:51 am by Cormac Early
Berman of the Sentencing Law and Policy blog reports on a Florida case which “spotlights an on-going struggle for state courts” to follow the Court’s decision in Graham v. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 3:18 am by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media and Communication Law Blog has an article examining the judgement on meaning handed down by Eady J last week in the case of Ware v Waters and Al Jazeera [2025] EWHC 389. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 3:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Pac., LLC v Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, 38 AD3d 34, 38), we find that the complaint sufficiently stated distinct causes of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. [read post]