Search for: "Walker, in Re"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 4:05 am
App. to Brief for Re spondent 49. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
In Dizaei v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1174 (16 May 2011) it said that: “This court does not re-try the defendant and cannot do so, because it does not hear the whole case. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm
When people say things like “we’re not sure,” “we’re uncertain,” or “it’s a matter of judgment,” they are consciously allocating a known risk. [read post]
31 May 2011, 4:01 am
Here are some recent articles from Canadian publications: Janet Walker, “Are National Class Actions Constitutional? [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
This week the Supreme Court has been hearing an appeal from the Court of Appeal in Re E (Children.) [read post]
25 May 2011, 11:46 pm
Therasense, now Abbott, got into a patent battle involving 5,820,551 and similar patents claiming "disposable blood glucose test strips for diabetes management. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:36 am
More fundamentally all litigation is an unwelcome prospect, particularly if you’re unwell.The effects of it can be mitigated to an extent by having an early mediation to resolve the issues, but that requires both parties to be prepared to negotiate. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:20 am
But did you know pedestrian related car accidents when the walker was distracted are on the rise simply because the walker cannot hear traffic approaching while listening to music with headphones or are so focused on the use of the electronic device that they are not aware of their surroundings? [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:45 am
" Portfolio | RSS - Jackson Walker"Jackson Walker is a Texas-based law firm with a national presence and global reach. [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:45 am
Blue Book ~ Philadelphia litigation paralegal Kim Walker tells us where to find The Bluebook's latest corrections and changes online. [read post]
11 May 2011, 5:28 pm
The New Jersey Approach to Walker Process Standing The New Jersey approach is what I call the legal theory espoused by former Federal Judge Stephen Orlofsky, sitting as a special master in In re K-DUR Antitrust Litigation.[13] Mr. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:58 am
They're about power and the proletariat. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:06 pm
Ditto re Pam Grier. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:12 pm
Originally posted in October 2010… Re-posted at request of readers. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:22 pm
Any reviewing court has to ask whether the facts warranted recusal, absent waiver, if allowed, and so we're back to the threshold questions: Does Walker want to marry in California? [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
“We’re going to all be hurt. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:27 am
Either they're your constituents or they're not. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 5:20 pm
According to Judge Walker, he decided “it would be permissible and appropriate to use the actual cross-examination excerpt from Perry” instead of re-enactments of the cross-examination he had earlier used because “videos or films of actual trials are more interesting, informative, compelling and, of course, realistic than re-enactments or fictionalized accounts in portraying trial proceedings. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:30 pm
” In re Murchison, 349 U.S. at 136. [read post]
