Search for: "Wells v. Edwards" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,398
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm by Matthew Hill
It is argued in this post that imprecise terminology and a failure to appreciate that Article 2 is engaged in Jamieson as well as Middleton inquests has confused this area, and that the learned judge in R (Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 760 (Admin) erred by eliding the investigative duties and the case-law from which they emerged. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 3:39 pm by Gideon
It highlights the difference between Faretta and Edwards and also Illinois v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
The letter explained the various options to avoid foreclosure, and asked theMabrys to forward current financial information to Aurora so it could consider theMabrys for these options.According to the lender, the Mabrys missed their September 2008 paymentas well, and mid-month Aurora sent them another letter describing ways to avoidforeclosure. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
” Stepping back from our series to find evidence this Term for its underlying thesis, we see Stevens taking a hard line toward even well-meaning but negligent officers of the court. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Kevin
  (The most famous example is Agincourt, a battle that Henry V won in 1415 and is still going on about.) [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In a June 21, 2010 Order and well-written Opinion, Judge Anthony S. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” COA denied, however, on whether, “on (2) whether Simmons was denied effective assistance of counsel during the penalty phase of his trial, in violation of the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments “ Edward Harold Schad v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm by SHG
” Mistaken identification is the most common element in a wrongful conviction, Edwards said, noting that nationally, 75 percent of the 254 DNA exonerees released since 1989 were sent to prison based on witness misidentification. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In past downturns, we haven’t seen ads like this (v. something staplegunned to a telephone pole). [read post]