Search for: ""Ring v. Arizona" OR "536 U.S. 584""
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2022, 5:21 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002)) in habeas proceedings. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 10:07 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 597-598, n. 4 (2002), the question decided was unambiguously limited to the finding of the aggravating circumstance, not the weighing. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002)? [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 9:07 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) (A statutory scheme is unconstitutional when judges must determine whether any aggravating factors are present which expose the defendant to greater punishment than otherwise permitted by a jury’s verdict.) [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 6:43 am
Ring v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) (A statutory scheme is unconstitutional when judges must determine whether any aggravating factors are present which expose the defendant to greater punishment than otherwise permitted by a jury’s verdict.) [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:40 am
See, e.g., Ring v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 597-598, n. 4 (2002) very explicitly confines its jury trial holding to the eligibility decision, i.e., the finding of at least one aggravating circumstance, and not to the weighing or the ultimate penalty decision.Did the Supreme Court in Hurst v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), where the court held that the Sixth Amendment requires that a jury, rather than a judge, must determine any fact upon which a legislature conditions an increase in the maximum punishment for a criminal offense. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), where the court held that the Sixth Amendment requires that a jury, rather than a judge, must determine any fact upon which a legislature conditions an increase in the maximum punishment for a criminal offense. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:08 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 609 (2002). [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:07 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002).Judge Martinez may be vindicated after all. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:48 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 8:35 am
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002); and (7) the death penalty is not proportionate in this case. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 7:15 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:17 am
Ring v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:22 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), and was therefore unconstitutional. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002). [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989) gave Lockett a broad reading, but Johnson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002) King, How Different is Death, Jury Sentencing in Capital and Non-Capital Cases Compared, 2 Ohio St. [read post]
