Search for: ""Strickland v. Washington" OR "466 U.S. 668""
Results 61 - 80
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2013, 1:33 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), then the ruling could be applied retroactively to convictions entered prior to 2010. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 4:10 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 2:15 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), the Court nevertheless determined that Douglas suffered no prejudice because had counsel presented evidence of his mental health, the jury would have heard about Douglas’ antisocial tendencies. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 9:04 am
Washington,466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:28 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984), by “an advocate who is . . . a member of the bar,” i.e., a licensed attorney. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 6:36 am
Washington[, 466 U.S. 668 (1984),] test instead of the more specific Hill v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 104 S. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 11:32 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:37 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
Washington, 466 U.S.668 (1984). . . . [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:52 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:46 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:55 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) which set forth the standard for determining Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claims. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord Gall v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 2:54 pm
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord Gall v. [read post]