Search for: "(f/n/u) Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 9:03 am
Boule, 596 U. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Early in 2021, overwhelming majorities of both the U.S. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court’s Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Gastiaburo, 16 F.3d 582, 586 (4th Cir. 1994) (stating that “[u]nder the Supreme Court’s precedents, the fact that impoundment may have made it virtually impossible for anyone to drive the car away or to tamper with its contents is irrelevant to the constitutionality of a warrantless search . . . . [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
F. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:09 pm
F. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
Part of Just Security’s work on accountability and election law. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
“[A]n engagement ring is a gift conditional on the subsequent marriage of the parties” Vann v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina Khan was… [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Davis, 27 Ohio App. 3d 65 (1985). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
U. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Guest Post by Samuel F. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 4:46 pm
N. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
In June 2018, based upon allegations that respondent Reymond F. was the child’s father, Reymond F. was added as a named respondent to the petition. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 1:16 pm
Federal Election Comm'n, 554 U. [read post]
