Search for: "**cohen v. I. N. S" Results 21 - 40 of 335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2023, 5:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
, 41 F4th 112, 123 [2d Cir 2022][“[I]n a crowded field of similar marks, each member of the crowd . . . is relatively weak in its ability to prevent use by others in a crowd”] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:36 pm by admin
Admittedly, I am playing the role of the curmudgeon here by pointing out errors or confusions in the third edition of the Reference Manual. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The Trustees sought unpaid contributions, interest, liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees (id., ,-i 8). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Marc DeGirolami
Alvarez (2012) (false statements of fact)   Week 9, Thursday, April 6: Offensive Speech, Hate Speech  Cohen v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Comm’n, 514 U.S. 35, 42 (1995) (citing Cohen, 337 U.S. at 546). [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
These products may have been sold at the following retailers, including, but not limited to: HEB, Kroger, Safeway, Sprouts Farmers Market, Trader Joe’s, Walmart, Weis Markets, and WinCo Foods. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:09 am by Bill Marler
Products are being removed from New World, Pak’n Save and Four Square shops nationwide, and from Trents and Raeward Fresh stores in the South Island. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:15 am by Tess Graham
by Rebecca Barber (@becjbarber) (March 25, 2022) Why Pushing Russia Out of Multilateral Institutions is Not a Solution to the Warby Fionnuala Ní Aoláin (March 22, 2022) United Nations Response Options to Russia’s Aggression: Opportunities and Rabbit Holesby Larry D. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A membership group might not have brand value (Happy Valley PTA example) v signaling I can afford LV, which does depend on brand value). [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “It is well settled that “[a]n attorney may not be held liable for failing to act outside the scope of the retainer” (Genesis Merchant Partners, L.P. v Gilbride, Tusa, Last & Spellane, LLC, 157 AD3d 479,482 [1st Dept 2018], citingAmbase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardell, 8 NY3d 428 [2007]). [read post]