Search for: "*1**barker v. Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
  Second, respondents outline four reasons why the Barker standard should not be applied to this case: (1) the Barker factors fail to take into account the interests of innocent p [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 6:54 pm
Steven Smith (SD Ind., Judge Barker), a 14-page opinion, Judge Ripple writes:Steven Smith was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Four years later, however, the Lords revisited the principles established by Fairchild in the case of Barker v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
The Fairchild exception was refined in Barker v Corus [2006] UKHL 20 so that each responsible party was only liable for the proportion of damages which correlated to their contribution to the risk to the claimant. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 8:35 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:37 am by Russ Bensing
Barker, and I’d also discussed the oral argument on that in June. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 882 P.2d 298, 308-09 (Cal. 1994); Barker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]