Search for: "*bowling v. Rose" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by Duets Guest Blogger
Roses don’t align with the image of the Super Bowl. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 3:12 am
  The day before the Michigan-Ohio State match-up for the Big Ten title and a trip to the Rose Bowl seems like an appropriate time to do it. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 3:12 am
  The day before the Michigan-Ohio State match-up for the Big Ten title and a trip to the Rose Bowl seems like an appropriate time to do it. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 7:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
**In passing, from http://sloanconsortium.org/node/228146As noted in Campbell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:33 am by Andres
The relevant case seems to be Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music Inc (of 2 Live Crew fame), which defines transformative use as use that not only supersedes the original work, but also that it adds “something new, with a further purpose or different character, altering the first with new expression, meaning, or message”. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
However, during our update we identified a substantial number of additional uses of “Identity Disclosure,” and it rose to become the most employed strategy. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
We've also published more pieces in the past few weeks concerning temporal jurisdiction and the Supreme Court's decision in Bowles v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
Larry Weinstein of Proskauer Rose LLP kindly answered my interview questions, which I have edited to add a few links and a picture. [read post]