Search for: "*excess Ins. Co. v. Reliance Ins. Co" Results 61 - 79 of 79
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
Excel Corp., 197 F.3d 200 (5th Cir. 1999) (reliance on an advice of counsel defense waives the privilege with respect to attorney-client communications pertinent to that defense); Ryers v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
IN THE MATTER OF THEESTATE OF ANN GRISCHUK,Deceased.___________________________ Submitted January 11, 2021 – Decided July 27, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino and DeAlmeida. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am by Wolfgang Demino
Cronenwett's Declaration, the Court is satisfied that the rate at which each individual worked is the prevailing hourly rate in the community for similar work and that the time billed was not excessive, duplicative, or inadequately documented. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
On May 11, 2011, SB 408 was presented to Governor Scott, who signed the legislation into law on May 17, 2011 (Chapter Law 2011-39). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Knoulton, No. 07-50785 In a suit alleging excessive force by defendant-police officer for shooting plaintiff during his arrest, denial of summary judgment to defendant is reversed where defendant acted reasonably in deciding to use deadly force, and no constitutional violation therefore occurred. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:08 pm by Law Lady
Weekly D768aContracts -- Statute of frauds -- Commercial lease was unenforceable where lease was for term in excess of one year but lacked two subscribing witnesses as required by section 689.01 -- Two signatures were required regardless of whether lease was deemed new or a renewal -- Conflict -- Doctrine of estoppel does not apply -- Tenant did not change its position in more than an insubstantial way where it was notified prior to effective date of new lease that it lacked two subscribing… [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:42 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
—The term ‘‘backlog’’ means, with respect to an immigration benefit application, the period of time in excess of 180 days that such application has been pending before the Immigration and Naturalization Service. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]