Search for: "*u. S. v. Clayton"
Results 1 - 20
of 92
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
But because he agreed with the government that the merger was likely to harm competition “in at least some relevant markets”–that is, on some of the specific city-to-city routes among the hundreds identified in the government’s complaint–he ruled it a violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:44 pm
Adams v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Clayton Cnty., 140 S. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:36 am
The Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Wainwright and Brady v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
The Culligan Decision But in June 2014, the First Department issued Culligan Soft Water Co. v Clayton Dubilier & Rice, LLC (118 AD3d 422 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
[3] Jarkesy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
“Failing to pay tax liabilities is corporate mismanagement,” ruled the Court in Fernandes v Matrix Model Staffing, Inc. (2022 NY Slip Op 31317(U) [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), “which defeats a petitioner’s reasonable expectations sufficient to constitute oppression” under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law (the “BCL”). [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
Vox and the BBC covered Twitter’s U-turn. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:46 pm
From People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 3:30 am
Desai, Text Is Not Enough, 93 U. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Michigan J. of Law Reform 175 (2013) (with Clayton Cramer and Joseph Olson). [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court’s recent decision overturning its 1973 decision Roe v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
From Perlot v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 4:07 am
In the order, Judge Marc Treadwell cites the US Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in <u>Bostock v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
”[29] And that’s a short list. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm
” In contrast, the agency’s previously released strategic plan had described the agency’s mission as promoting “competition” for the benefit of consumers, consistent with the case law’s commitment to protecting consumer welfare, dating at least to the Supreme Court’s 1979 decision in Reiter v. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
The Ninth Circuit's Young v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 8:08 am
DESAI (UW Law) In Bostock v. [read post]
